The writer's claim rule · opposite vs. unmentioned · qualifier traps
Topic & Why It Matters
True / False / Not Given questions ask you to decide whether a statement agrees with the factual information in the passage. They appear in both the Academic and General Training tests and are among the most feared question types, because the three-way choice gives examiners room to build very precise traps. The task tests careful comparison: you must separate what the passage clearly states from what merely sounds reasonable.
Test-takers lose marks here for two recurring reasons. The first is treating NOT GIVEN as a weak form of FALSE — choosing FALSE whenever they cannot find support, when the absence of support is itself the signal for NOT GIVEN. The second is importing outside knowledge: the examiner is not asking what is true in the world, but whether the passage gives evidence for the exact statement, down to its qualifiers.
This chapter gives you three full practice passages of increasing difficulty — a social-policy text on public libraries, a history-of-science narrative on the invention of vulcanised rubber, and a dense scientific text on sleep and memory. Across them you will meet every TFNG trap that appears on test day: opposite-meaning FALSE items, scope and qualifier traps (all vs.several), real-world-true-but-unstated NOT GIVEN items, and the comparison and causation traps that catch even strong readers.
Knowledge Points
What the question type tests
True / False / Not Given (TFNG) tests whether you can compare a statement with the factual information in the passage. TRUE means the passage confirms the whole statement. FALSE means the passage contradicts it. NOT GIVEN means the passage does not give enough information to decide either way. Crucially, you are scoring the relationship between the statement and the text — not whether the statement is true in the real world.
Example
Passage“In a 2022 survey of urban library systems, most libraries reported stable or slightly rising borrowing figures for children's books, even while adult fiction loans declined.”
TRUE“Children's book borrowing did not fall in most surveyed libraries.” — confirmed by 'stable or slightly rising … most libraries'.
FALSE“Adult fiction loans rose in most systems.” — the passage says the reverse ('declined').
NOT GIVEN“The survey covered libraries on three continents.” — scope of the survey is never specified.
The writer's claim rule — ignore your own knowledge
You are judging the claim made by the passage, not the state of the real world. Even if a statement is factually correct in reality, it must be marked NOT GIVEN if the passage does not state or clearly support it. This is the single most common source of lost marks: candidates 'know' something is true and tick TRUE, when the passage never actually said it.
Example
Statement“Slow-wave sleep occurs earlier in the night than REM sleep.” (Passage 3)
RealityThis is true in sleep science — so it is tempting to mark TRUE.
The passageIt names both phases but never states which comes first in the night.
CorrectNOT GIVEN — the real-world fact is irrelevant; the text gives no order.
FALSE is not the same as NOT GIVEN
FALSE requires an explicit contradiction — the passage must state the opposite, or something logically incompatible with the statement. NOT GIVEN means the topic may well appear, but one piece of information the statement depends on is simply absent. If you cannot put your finger on the contradicting words, you cannot choose FALSE.
Example
Statement A“Charles Goodyear had studied chemistry at university.” (Passage 2)
→ FALSEThe passage says he had 'no formal training in chemistry' — a direct contradiction.
Statement B“Goodyear's wife encouraged him to abandon his research.” (Passage 2)
→ NOT GIVENHis family's poverty is mentioned, but the wife's opinion is never given.
Every qualifier in the statement matters
TFNG statements often turn on a single small word: all, every, some, most, only, mainly, always, never, before, after, more than. The bulk of a statement can match the passage perfectly while one changed qualifier makes the whole thing FALSE. Read the statement at the level of individual words, not general gist.
Example
Passage“Several systems have also expanded their print collections in languages commonly spoken by local immigrant communities.” (Passage 1)
Statement“ALL library systems expanded print collections for immigrant communities.”
The trapEverything matches except the scope word: 'several' became 'all'.
CorrectFALSE — the passage limits the claim to 'several'; 'all' over-states it.
The NOT GIVEN test — name the missing detail
Before you commit to NOT GIVEN, force yourself to say exactly which piece of information is missing. NOT GIVEN is the answer when the passage discusses the topic but is silent on the specific point, comparison, reason, or quantity the statement asserts. If you can name the gap, NOT GIVEN is safe; if you cannot, you are probably looking at TRUE or FALSE.
Example
Statement“Goodyear earned more from vulcanisation than Thomas Hancock did.” (Passage 2)
What's thereWe learn Goodyear 'never profited significantly' and Hancock held a British patent.
The gapThe passage never states how much Hancock earned — so no comparison is possible.
CorrectNOT GIVEN — the missing detail is Hancock's earnings.
Paraphrase still controls the answer
The statement rarely repeats the passage word-for-word. Expect synonym substitution, noun-to-verb shifts, active-to-passive changes, and compressed phrasing. Match meaning, not surface vocabulary — and be suspicious when a statement reuses the passage's exact words, because examiners often pair a familiar phrase with a distorted claim.
Example
Passage“families often use picture books and early readers alongside online resources” (Passage 1)
Statement“Families may combine printed children's books with online resources.”
The bridge'use … alongside' → 'combine'; 'picture books and early readers' → 'printed children's books'.
CorrectTRUE — no words are shared with 'combine', yet the meaning is identical.
Questions follow passage order
TFNG items normally appear in the same order as the information in the passage: the evidence for Q2 comes after the evidence for Q1, and so on. Once you locate the answer window for one item, start scanning for the next from that point — never from the top of the passage. This habit alone saves several minutes across a full test.
Example
Passage 2Q1 answer is in Paragraph A → Q3 in B → Q6 in C → Q7 in D → Q9 in E.
Use itAfter confirming the Paragraph C item, begin the next scan from C — not paragraph A.
CautionOrder helps you locate, but always read the window: a nearby contrast marker can still flip the answer.
Watch comparison and causation traps
Two statement types fail most often. Comparison claims ('X is more common than Y', 'A is the same as B') require the passage to compare BOTH things — if only one side is described, the answer is NOT GIVEN. Causation claims ('X is caused by Y', 'X led to Y') require the passage to state the direction of cause and effect — a mere correlation, or two facts placed side by side, is not enough.
Example
Comparison“Brain-activity tests are now used more often than behavioural tests.” (Passage 3) — passage says researchers 'increasingly favour' them, not that they are already more common → NOT GIVEN.
CausationA passage may say a museum 'expanded its online archive' and 'visitor numbers rose' without claiming one caused the other — do not invent the link.
RuleFor 'more than' check both sides; for 'caused by' check that the text actually states the arrow of causation.
Step-by-Step Strategy
1
Read the statement and mark its claims
Underline the searchable keyword (a name, number, date, or technical term) and, separately, the qualifiers — all, only, never, before, mainly, more than. The keyword tells you WHERE to look; the qualifier usually decides the answer once you get there.
2
Scan for the topic, not the whole sentence
Use the most distinctive keyword to locate the relevant passage window. If that word has been paraphrased, scan for a likely synonym or a related example. Do not try to find the statement's exact wording — it almost never appears verbatim.
3
Read the whole answer window
Read the sentence containing the keyword plus the sentence before and after it. TFNG answers frequently depend on a contrast or limitation introduced nearby ('however', 'although', 'only', 'several'), which a one-sentence glance will miss.
4
Apply the three-way test
Ask in order: Can I prove the statement from the passage? → TRUE. Can I prove the opposite from the passage? → FALSE. Is one required detail simply absent? → NOT GIVEN. Run all three; do not stop at the first that feels plausible.
5
Check the qualifier before finalising
Compare the statement's scope with the passage's scope. 'Some' upgraded to 'most', 'many' upgraded to 'all', 'may' hardened into 'will' — each turns a true-looking statement FALSE. This is the final, decisive check on most items.
6
Do not over-infer
TFNG rewards what the text states or directly entails, not reasonable real-world inference. If the passage says extended hours raised visits 'in many neighbourhoods', that does not prove 'in every neighbourhood', and it says nothing about whether borrowing rose.
7
Manage the clock — guess and move on
Budget under a minute per item. If the window is genuinely silent on the point, that silence IS the evidence for NOT GIVEN — trust it rather than re-reading. There is no penalty for a wrong answer, so never leave a blank; flag and return only if time remains.
Common Pitfalls
Mistake
Corrective Rule
Choosing FALSE because you cannot find support
Absence of support means NOT GIVEN, not FALSE. FALSE requires words in the passage that contradict the statement. If you cannot quote the contradiction, you cannot choose FALSE.
Ignoring small qualifiers
Check absolute and limiting words carefully. 'Some residents objected' does not prove 'most residents objected', and 'several systems' is not 'all systems'.
Using outside knowledge
Treat the passage as the only evidence source. A statement that is true in real life is still NOT GIVEN if the text does not state or clearly support it.
Matching keywords instead of meaning
A statement can share several words with the passage and still be FALSE — or reuse a familiar phrase while distorting the claim. Compare the meaning, not the vocabulary.
Reading too narrow a window
Read at least one sentence before and after the keyword. The answer is often controlled by a contrast marker ('however', 'although') sitting just outside the obvious sentence.
Inventing a cause-and-effect link
Two facts placed near each other do not prove that one caused the other. For 'X led to Y', the passage must state the direction of causation, not merely mention both X and Y.
Treating a one-sided comparison as TRUE
A 'more than' or 'the same as' statement needs the passage to describe BOTH items. If only one side appears, the comparison is unverifiable — choose NOT GIVEN.
Vocabulary & Signpost Bank
Expression / Statement Language
What It Means for Your Strategy
all / every / always / never
Absolute scope. A single exception in the passage can make the statement FALSE.
some / several / many / most
Quantity scope. Do not upgrade a weak claim ('several') into a stronger one ('all').
only / solely / exclusively / mainly
Restriction. The passage must rule out all other causes, purposes, or groups.
before / after / during / since
Time order. Check the sequence exactly; reversed chronology often signals FALSE.
however / although / whereas / yet
Contrast. The answer may come after the marker, not before it — read the full window.
suggests / indicates / is likely to
Hedged evidence. Do not convert cautious language into certainty (TRUE).
is caused by / leads to / results from
Cause-effect claim. The passage must state the direction of causation, not just both facts.
the same as / different from / more than
Comparison claim. Check BOTH items being compared, not just one side.
first / the most / the best
Superlative / ranking. The passage must establish the ranking, not merely a positive fact.
may / might / could / in principle
Possibility, not actuality. 'It might occur' does not prove 'it occurs'.
Practice Passage 1 & Questions
Difficulty: ★★☆ (Band 6–7). A social-policy text. The traps here are mostly scope traps — watch where the passage says ‘several’ or ‘many’ but a statement claims ‘all’ or ‘every’.
Read the passage, then answer the eight questions. Choose TRUE if the statement agrees with the passage, FALSE if it contradicts the passage, or NOT GIVEN if there is not enough information. Click Check Answers to see the exact passage reference and reasoning for each.
The Changing Role of Public Libraries~382 words
A
Public libraries in many cities have changed substantially over the last twenty years. Once defined mainly by printed books and quiet reading rooms, they now offer services such as language classes, job-search workshops, digital media labs, and public internet access. This shift has been partly driven by changes in how people find information, but it has also reflected a wider understanding of libraries as civic spaces where residents can learn skills and meet others.
B
The move toward digital services has not meant that printed collections are disappearing. In a 2022 survey of urban library systems, most libraries reported stable or slightly rising borrowing figures for children's books, even while adult fiction loans declined. Library managers explained that families often use picture books and early readers alongside online resources, rather than replacing one format with another. Several systems have also expanded their print collections in languages commonly spoken by local immigrant communities.
C
Funding remains a serious constraint. Although library visits increased in many neighbourhoods after extended opening hours were introduced, the additional staffing costs made the policy difficult to maintain. Some branches reduced specialist workshops during budget reviews, while others relied on volunteers to support basic computer sessions. Researchers warn that volunteer-led services can be valuable, but they cannot fully substitute for trained staff when visitors need detailed help with legal forms, employment applications, or accessibility technology.
D
Another challenge is measuring success. Traditional indicators, such as the number of books borrowed, capture only part of a modern library's role. A teenager who uses a library computer to submit a college application may not borrow a book, but the visit may still have significant educational value. For this reason, several city councils have begun collecting broader data, including programme attendance, Wi-Fi use, study-room bookings, and community feedback.
E
Despite these changes, librarians argue that the central purpose of the institution has remained consistent: providing free access to knowledge. What has changed is the form that access takes. A library may now lend tablets, teach coding, host health-information sessions, or provide a warm public space during winter, but these activities are extensions of the same public mission rather than departures from it.
Questions 1–8. Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage?
1.Modern public libraries provide services beyond lending printed books.
2.The main reason libraries changed was that city governments ordered them to become civic spaces.
3.Adult fiction loans rose in most urban library systems in the 2022 survey.
4.Families may combine printed children's books with online resources.
5.All library systems expanded their print collections for immigrant communities.
6.Extended opening hours increased visits in every neighbourhood.
7.Volunteer-led services are always more effective than trained staff for computer sessions.
8.Some city councils now measure library success using data other than book borrowing.
Practice Passage 2 & Questions
Difficulty: ★★★ (Band 7–8). A history-of-science narrative full of dates, names, and sequence. Watch for a FALSE built on a reversed expectation (‘exactly as planned’) and a NOT GIVEN built on a one-sided comparison.
Read the passage, then answer the nine questions. Several statements share vocabulary with the passage while changing the claim — compare meaning, not words.
Charles Goodyear and the Vulcanisation of Rubber~398 words
A
Natural rubber, harvested from the sap of certain tropical trees, was known in Europe by the eighteenth century, but its practical uses were severely limited. In its raw state the material was highly sensitive to temperature: it turned soft and sticky in summer heat and became hard and brittle in winter cold. Waterproof boots and coats made from it were briefly fashionable in the 1820s, yet customers quickly abandoned them once the garments melted in warm weather or cracked in the frost. By the early 1830s, many investors had come to regard rubber as a commercial dead end.
B
Charles Goodyear, an American hardware merchant with no formal training in chemistry, became convinced that rubber could be stabilised if it were treated correctly. From 1834 onwards he devoted himself almost entirely to the problem, often working in borrowed kitchens and even in prison cells, where he was confined for unpaid debts. He experimented by mixing raw rubber with a wide range of substances — magnesia, lime, nitric acid — achieving partial and unreliable improvements. His family endured years of poverty as he pursued the research, and contemporaries frequently dismissed him as a hopeless dreamer.
C
The breakthrough came in 1839, and according to the best-known account it was partly accidental. Goodyear was handling a mixture of rubber and sulfur when a portion of it came into contact with a hot stove. Instead of simply melting, the rubber charred slightly but retained its elasticity, and the material around the scorched area stayed firm and flexible even after it had cooled. Goodyear grasped the significance of what he had seen and spent several further years working out the precise combination of heat, time, and sulfur needed to make the process reliable.
D
Goodyear obtained a United States patent for the process, later named vulcanisation, in 1844. Commercial success, however, continued to elude him. His patents were widely infringed, and the legal battles he fought to defend them consumed much of what little money he earned. In England, the manufacturer Thomas Hancock examined samples of Goodyear's rubber, developed a comparable process of his own, and secured a British patent a few weeks before Goodyear's own application there. Goodyear died in 1860 owing substantial debts, having never profited significantly from an invention that others were already exploiting.
E
Vulcanised rubber went on to transform nineteenth- and twentieth-century industry. Its durability and resistance to temperature made possible products ranging from industrial seals and hoses to the pneumatic tyres on which modern road and air transport depend. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, founded several decades after his death, took its name in his honour, although it had no direct connection to the inventor or his family.
Questions 1–9. Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage?
1.Raw natural rubber performed poorly in both hot and cold conditions.
2.Rubber waterproof clothing remained popular throughout the 1820s.
3.Goodyear had studied chemistry at university before beginning his experiments.
4.Goodyear carried out some of his experiments while imprisoned for debt.
5.Goodyear's wife urged him to give up his research.
6.The 1839 discovery happened exactly as Goodyear had planned.
7.Thomas Hancock secured a British patent before Goodyear applied for one in England.
8.Goodyear earned more from vulcanisation than Thomas Hancock did.
9.The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company was founded by members of Goodyear's family.
Practice Passage 3 & Questions
Difficulty: ★★★★ (Band 8–9). A dense scientific text with hedged, abstract language. The hardest items are two NOT GIVENs — one a real-world fact the text never states, the other a frequency comparison the text never makes.
Read the passage, then answer the eight questions. Resist the urge to fill gaps with what you already know about sleep — score each statement against the passage alone.
Sleep and the Consolidation of Memory~392 words
A
The idea that sleep plays an active part in memory has a long history, but only in recent decades have researchers begun to map the mechanisms involved. Memory formation is now commonly described as a two-stage process. During waking experience, new information is encoded in a fragile, temporary form. For this information to be retained, it must subsequently be consolidated — stabilised and integrated into long-term storage. A growing body of evidence indicates that much of this consolidation occurs during sleep, rather than during the waking hours that follow learning.
B
Sleep is not a uniform state. It cycles through distinct phases, the most studied of which are slow-wave sleep, characterised by large, synchronised brain waves, and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep, during which most vivid dreaming occurs. Experiments in which volunteers learn lists of words or pairs of facts suggest that slow-wave sleep is particularly important for declarative memory — the conscious recollection of facts and events. Participants allowed a period of slow-wave sleep after learning typically recall more than those kept awake for an equivalent period, even when the total elapsed time is held constant.
C
The role of REM sleep is more contested. Some studies associate it with the consolidation of procedural memory — the largely unconscious 'how-to' knowledge involved in skills such as typing or playing an instrument. Other researchers question whether REM sleep is essential at all, pointing out that certain medications suppress REM almost entirely without producing the dramatic memory deficits the theory might predict. The relationship between specific sleep phases and specific kinds of memory therefore remains an area of active disagreement.
D
Studies of sleep deprivation reinforce the link between sleep and memory, though they must be interpreted with care. People deprived of sleep after learning generally perform worse on later tests than those allowed to sleep. However, sleep loss also impairs attention and mood, so a poor test result may partly reflect a failure to concentrate rather than a failure to consolidate. Disentangling these effects is methodologically difficult, and researchers increasingly favour study designs that monitor brain activity directly rather than relying solely on behavioural measures.
E
Despite considerable progress, fundamental questions remain open. It is not yet clear why consolidation should depend on sleep at all, when in principle it might occur during periods of quiet wakefulness. Nor is there agreement on whether the memory functions of sleep evolved as its primary purpose or merely as a secondary benefit of a state that serves other needs. What most researchers now accept, however, is that sleep is far from the passive shutdown it was once assumed to be.
Questions 1–8. Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage?
1.Scientists have understood the mechanisms linking sleep and memory for several centuries.
2.Newly encoded memories are initially unstable.
3.Most memory consolidation takes place while a person is awake after learning.
4.Slow-wave sleep appears to support the memory of facts and events.
5.Slow-wave sleep occurs earlier in the night than REM sleep.
6.All researchers agree that REM sleep is essential for forming procedural memories.
7.Certain medications can suppress REM sleep almost completely.
8.Brain-activity monitoring is now used more often than behavioural testing in this field.
Self-Check
Answer these from memory. If you cannot answer all four, re-read the relevant section.
What is the precise difference between FALSE and NOT GIVEN, and what must you be able to point to before choosing FALSE?
Why can a statement that is true in the real world still be the answer NOT GIVEN?
Which categories of small words most often decide a TFNG answer, and why?
Why are comparison statements ('X more than Y') and causation statements ('X led to Y') especially prone to being NOT GIVEN?
Answers:
(1) FALSE means the passage states the opposite of, or something incompatible with, the statement. NOT GIVEN means the passage does not give enough information to prove or disprove one required part of it. Before choosing FALSE you must be able to point to the specific words in the passage that contradict the statement.
(2) The task scores the statement against the passage, not against reality. If the text does not state or clearly support the point, the answer is NOT GIVEN even when the statement is factually correct — your background knowledge is not evidence.
(3) Scope and quantity words (all, every, some, most, only), time words (before, after, since), modality (may, will, must), and comparison/causation words. A single one of these can turn a statement that otherwise matches the passage into FALSE or NOT GIVEN.
(4) A comparison needs the passage to describe BOTH things being compared; if only one side appears, it cannot be verified. A causation claim needs the passage to state the direction of cause and effect; two facts mentioned near each other do not prove a link. In both cases the missing element makes NOT GIVEN the safe answer.